EAL

Security

Evaluation Assurance Level -- a numerical rating (1-7) indicating the depth and rigor of a Common Criteria security evaluation.

Também conhecido como: Evaluation Assurance Level

EAL

An Evaluation Assurance Level (EALEALSecuritySecurity evaluation depth rating (1-7).Click to view →) is a numerical rating from 1 to 7 that indicates the depth, rigor, and formality of a Common Criteria security evaluation. Higher EAL levels require more extensive documentation, more thorough testing, and more formal design verification methods. In the smart card industry, EAL ratings determine whether a chip or card platform can be deployed in payment, government, and telecom applications.

EAL Scale

Level Name Description
EAL1 Functionally tested Basic independent testing
EAL2 Structurally tested Developer testing + vulnerability analysis
EAL3 Methodically tested and checked Design and test evidence
EAL4 Methodically designed, tested, and reviewed Full design documentation + independent testing
EAL5 Semi-formally designed and tested Formal modeling of security functions
EAL6 Semi-formally verified design and tested Formal modeling + structured implementation
EAL7 Formally verified design and tested Mathematical proof of security properties

EAL Augmentation (EAL4+, EAL5+)

Smart card certifications almost always use augmented EAL levels, denoted with a "+" suffix. The augmentation adds specific assurance components — most commonly AVA_VAN.5 (high resistance to attackers with high attack potential). This is critical for smart cards because the physical attack surface requires evaluation of resistance to SPA/DPA power analysis, fault injection, and other side-channel attacks.

For example, an EMVEMVApplicationGlobal chip payment card standard.Click to view → payment chip certified at "EAL4+ AVA_VAN.5" has undergone EAL4 design review plus high-level vulnerability analysis equivalent to EAL6 attack-resistance testing.

Industry Requirements

Application Typical EAL Mandated By
EMV payment chips EAL4+ EMVCo
ePassport chips EAL5+ ICAO 9303 + national PP
eID cards EAL5+ BSI TR-03110, national regulations
SIM/UICC EAL4+ to EAL6+ GSMA SAS
MULTOS OS EAL7 MULTOSMULTOSSoftwareHigh-security multi-app card OS.Click to view → consortium
FIPS 140 Level 3 EAL4+ (CC mapping) NIST

Evaluation Cost and Timeline

A typical smart card CC evaluation takes 6-18 months and costs $200K-$1M depending on the EAL level and complexity. Chip vendors (NXP, Infineon, Samsung) maintain composite evaluations covering the hardware IC, while card OS vendors (JavaCard implementations) certify the software platform separately. The final card product may receive a composite certificate combining both evaluations.

Perguntas frequentes

The smart card glossary is a comprehensive reference of technical terms, acronyms, and concepts used in smart card technology. It covers protocols (APDU, T=0, T=1), security (Common Criteria, EAL, HSM), hardware (SE, EEPROM, contact pad), and applications (EMV, ePassport, eSIM). It serves developers, product managers, and engineers.

Yes. SmartCardFYI provides glossary definitions in 15 languages including English, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Spanish, Portuguese, Hindi, Arabic, French, Russian, German, Turkish, Vietnamese, Indonesian, and Thai.